← All Case Studies · SoMa Buyer
One real closing, told the way it actually happened.
A San Francisco renter looking at $5,000 a month for a one-bedroom in SoMa bought a one-bedroom loft condo with parking for $730,000 instead. With 25% down and a 6.5% rate, his all-in monthly payment came to $5,147. He lost the first condo he bid on to a higher offer, then bought a second loft that had sat on the market for 91 days.
He needed a new place, and the rent didn't make sense to him. The one-bedroom condo he found to rent in SoMa was $5,000 a month, and he didn't feel rents like that were worth the money.
His main requirement for buying was simple: owning couldn't cost much more per month than renting. With 25% down, it didn't. His all-in monthly payment came to $5,147, about $147 more than the rent he had been looking at.
A one-bedroom under $1 million, with parking if possible. He also wanted to be close enough to South Beach for a shorter commute to work. We focused on the Mission, SoMa, Potrero Hill, Mission Bay, and Dogpatch.
Five competing offers came in, and ours finished second. We started at $725,000, then learned we were up against five other offers. We rewrote at $760,000 with no contingencies and an 18-day close. The seller accepted an offer at $775,000. The listing agent told me all five offers had started out about the same.
That loss taught us two things. In my read, SoMa was heating up because rents were climbing, and SoMa has a lot of homes under $1 million that fit a first-time buyer budget. Losing at that price also gave us a real number for what buyers were paying for a one-bedroom in this range.
It had been on the market for about 91 days and had already dropped its price twice, from $785,000 to $770,000 to $745,000. The open houses after the last drop didn't draw much traffic. It was also a third-floor unit with no elevator, which I think kept buyers away.
On the plus side, the HOA reserves were about 60% funded, which I consider pretty good for San Francisco. It was a smaller building on a fairly quiet block for SoMa, with a very responsive HOA president.
We offered $730,000, which was $15,000 under the $745,000 asking price, with a loan contingency and a 21-day close. My client wanted to offer $750,000. I recommended we start lower because of the price drops, the lack of interest, and the days on market.
That was a different approach than the first condo, where we waived contingencies, shortened the close, and still lost. The seller accepted $730,000 without a counter.
Because they weren't in the disclosures, and a bad report can turn into higher HOA dues or a special assessment. Two rules deal with inspections of exterior decks, balconies, and stairs in California: San Francisco Housing Code Section 604 and a state law known as SB 326. Whether they apply depends on the building.
Since neither report was in the disclosure package, we put a contingency in place. If the reports had shown a lot of work, my client could have backed out. I had another deal earlier this year that nearly fell through over this same paperwork, and lenders are starting to ask about it. In my experience, a lot of agents and associations haven't heard of it yet.
I asked the HOA about it. The president looked into it, and the City said a Section 604 inspection was required. The HOA and a deck inspection company concluded the state balcony law didn't apply, because of how the decks are built into the structure. The HOA scheduled the Section 604 inspection for the middle of our escrow.
We also looked closely at the reserve study, which had money set aside for the decks. With that, my client felt confident waiving the contingency and moving forward. Before we closed, the inspector finished the decks and shared preliminary findings: structurally sound, with waterproof paint recommended in a few spots as preventive maintenance. The full written report was still on its way.
Smoothly. I worked with his lender through escrow and checked in with my client regularly so we could remove the loan contingency within 14 days. We did, on time, with no shaky moments. I also went through the disclosures with him in detail.
He closed on a one-bedroom, 1.5-bath loft condo with parking in SoMa for $730,000, with 25% down at a 6.5% rate. His all-in monthly payment is $5,147, close to the $5,000 he was looking at paying in rent.
The first condo sold for $775,000 and the second for $730,000, about $45,000 less. They were different units in different situations, so it's not a like-for-like comparison. It does show how much a listing's days on market and price history can change the offer you write.
Start by getting pre-approved so you know what you can afford. Then look closely at the building, not just the unit:
If you're renting and wondering whether buying could work for you, I can walk you through the numbers as your buyer's agent.
Read my honest guide to SoMa: who it's right for, what units are actually selling for, and what it's really like to live there.
FAQ
Thinking about buying in San Francisco?
Fifteen minutes, no commitment. Tell me where you are and I'll tell you honestly what your next step looks like.
Book a Free Consultation